7
See what others are saying about Doody's Core Titles®
Core Title Selection Process
Contributing Selectors and Others
eBook Aggregator Partners
History and Background
Frequently Asked Questions
Other Doody's Services
Privacy Statement
Home
Additional Products and Services for Libraries
The 2021 edition of this essential collection development tool for health sciences libraries of all sizes represents the collective wisdom of almost 200 medical librarians and content experts on the must-have titles in 121 specialties! You may order Doody's Core Titles 2021 by Clicking Here.
A Guide to Critical Appraisal Tools and Reporting Guidelines for Evidence-Based Practice
 
Claire Sharifi, MLIS
Reference Librarian, Liaison to the School of Nursing and Health Professions
Gleeson Library
University of San Francisco

Robin Buccheri, PhD, RN, NP, FAAN
Professor Emerita
School of Nursing & Health Professions
University of San Francisco

Introduction

Critical appraisal tools and reporting guidelines are two important tools in an evidence-based practice (EBP) toolbox. Critical appraisal tools guide a consumer of evidence through an objective, analytical, evaluation process and aid in the assessment of evidence for validity, reliability, and applicability to clinical practice. Essentially, critical appraisal is the process that allows nurses and other healthcare practitioners to identify evidence that comes from rigorous, reliable literature. Reporting guidelines increase the likelihood that research and other types of evidence are reported upon completely and with transparency. Adherence to reporting guidelines in the medical literature has been found to be low (Samaan et al. 2013), and the incorporation of reporting guidelines into nursing education can help registered and advanced practice nurses achieve EBP competencies related to evidence dissemination (Melnyk, Gallagher-Ford, & Fineout-Overholt, 2017).

Background

Despite the fact that these tools are intended to facilitate evidence-based practice, we found that the doctoral nursing students we work with struggled with identifying and selecting an appropriate critical appraisal tool, understanding the difference between critical appraisal tools and reporting guidelines, and envisioning how each might be used in a report or publication. When tasked with critically appraising an article, our students often turned to a familiar critical appraisal tool, even if it was not the most appropriate tool for the methodology at hand, and they had trouble selecting the best tool from the large number of tools available. This phenomenon is not specific to our students or our institution, and is widely discussed in the literature (Katrak, Bialocerkowski, Massy-Westropp, Kumar, & Grimmer, 2004).

Methodology

In order to help students not only understand what critical appraisal tools and reporting guidelines are, but also select the best tool for the task at hand, we created a resource that attempts to clarify this sometimes confusing topic. A comprehensive search of PubMed, CINAHL, and Scopus was undertaken in order to identify critical appraisal tools and reporting guidelines commonly used by nurses. Critical appraisal tools and reporting guidelines found through this literature review search were combined with tools identified by one author during her career spent teaching EBP at the doctoral level, attending EBP conferences, reviewing EBP textbooks, and networking with other EBP nurse educators. Nine critical appraisal tools and eight reporting guidelines relevant to nursing and frequently used in nursing EBP were selected. Each tool was reviewed thoroughly and a summary and tables were created to facilitate the use of critical appraisal tools and reporting guidelines.

A Guide to Critical Appraisal Tools and Reporting Guidelines

The resource, in article form (published in Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, volume 14 issue 6, page 463-472) includes a clear, plain language definition of both critical appraisal tools and reporting guidelines. It enables users to understand the scope of critical appraisal tools and reporting guidelines and to differentiate between the two. It also includes: a brief, one-paragraph overview of each of the selected critical appraisal tools and reporting guidelines; a table that facilitates the selection of an appropriate critical appraisal tool or reporting guideline based on the methodology of the article, report, or manuscript; a table that provides instructions on how to access the full text of included critical appraisal tools and reporting guidelines; and citations to articles that used the critical appraisal tools and reporting guidelines so the reader can see the tools in use.

Conclusion

Although critical appraisal tools and reporting guidelines are useful tools that have the potential to improve scholarship and EBP, identifying and selecting the appropriate tool is a potentially challenging and frustrating experience for both novice and expert consumers and reporters of evidence. By providing clear descriptions of each tool, as well as tables that provide an easy reference for matching the type of tool with an article's methodology, this resource lessens that challenge and minimizes frustration.

References

Buccheri, R., & Sharifi, C. (2017). Critical Appraisal Tools and Reporting Guidelines for Evidence-Based Practice. Worldviews On Evidence-Based Nursing, 14(6), 463-472. doi:10.1111/wvn.12258

Katrak, P., Bialocerkowski, A. E., Massy-Westropp, N., Kumar, V. S., & Grimmer, K. A. (2004). A systematic review of the content of critical appraisal tools. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 4(22), e1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-4-22

Melnyk, B. M., Gallagher-Ford, L., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2017). Implementing the evidence-based practice (EBP) competencies in healthcare. Indianapolis, IN: Sigma Theta Tau International.

Samaan, Z., Mbuagbaw, L., Kosa, S., Borg Debono, V., Dillenburg, R., Zhang, S., et al. (2013). A systematic scoping review of adherence to reporting guidelines in health care literature. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 2013(6), 169–188. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S43952

Get Involved!

Interested in contributing a Featured Article for Doody's Core Titles? Submit an interest form and we'll be in touch with you soon.

We regularly update the Doody's Core Titles® web site when eBook versions, reviews, or information about forthcoming or new editions of titles in DCT 2021. This month we feature:
  • 33 new eBooks
  • 9 new Reviews (Premium Subscribers Only)
  • 1 new Edition

Just Published! Doody's Core Titles® 2021 is available today!

Log in or Order Now to access the full Doody's Core Titles® list.
Doody's Core Titles® 2021
Key Features
A newly selected list of the most distinguished references by subject area
eBook Links to eBook aggregators that carry digital versions
Free monthly Newsletter about new eBooks, new editions, and valuable industry news
Expert recommend-ations of Core Titles and Essential Purchase picks in 121 specialties
Extensive search and filter utilities
Easy-to-use export and print tools
Click here to read what Collection Development Librarians say about Doody's Core Titles®.
Sign up for our Free monthly newsletter alerting you to new eBooks and new editions of DCT titles, as well as valuable industry news and insights. DCT Licensees will have a link to all of the features of Doody's Core Titles® from the newsletter.
Interested in sponsorship opportunities for Doody's Core Titles®? Click here to get more information.