7
See what others are saying about Doody's Core Titles®
Core Title Selection Process
Contributing Selectors and Others
eBook Aggregator Partners
History and Background
Frequently Asked Questions
Other Doody's Services
Privacy Statement
Home
Additional Products and Services for Libraries
The 2021 edition of this essential collection development tool for health sciences libraries of all sizes represents the collective wisdom of almost 200 medical librarians and content experts on the must-have titles in 121 specialties! You may order Doody's Core Titles 2021 by Clicking Here.
The Value of Books in the Instant Access Age: Promoting My Nursing Collection
 
Iris Fiallos, MLIS
Learning Resource Manager
Fortis College, Cutler Bay, FL

The Information Literacy Standards for Nursing1, promulgated by the ACRL (Association of College & Research Libraries), help to define what skills and knowledge are intrinsic to evidence-based practice and translational research in nursing.

Standards Two (“The information literate nurse accesses needed information effectively and efficiently.”) and Three (“The information literate nurse critically evaluates the procured information and its sources, and as a result, decides whether or not to modify the initial query and/or seek additional sources and whether to develop a new research process.”) are the standards that I always find myself addressing as a rudimentary exercise since often my collection and the resources in it sit unused, detritus in the age of instant access to information. At least, this is what most students believe and what some faculty think. It is then, probably, no surprise to most librarians that students predominantly use the Internet as a “reliable” source of information.

As a librarian and an informatics instructor in a small nursing college, I find students’ reliance on the Internet highly troublesome. I understand their thinking, that quick access to information in an intense learning environment saves them time and trouble. Many of the students believe “all information is equal” regardless of the source.

Some of my students get indignant when I inform them that they may not use Wikipedia as a source. However, their indignation often segues into a conversation about the genesis of information and the variety of formats/sources available to them. This is where I usually suffer groans and a multitude of arguments defending Wikipedia or other sources on the Internet. I listen carefully and then ask the question: How are they to become competent professionals who are health literate and practicing the best clinical medicine on behalf of their patients if they do not understand how to locate, select, and evaluate their sources?

I usually shift the discussion to a cursory explanation about how information becomes standardized and accepted as a knowledge base in a discipline. We often discuss the venues in which they can find the newest information in a discipline and where they will most often find that information presented -- usually around a theme at a conference. Conferences, however, do not present an organized body of knowledge and, at times, what is presented may be highly theoretical.

We then trace how this information or theory may be put to the test -- this is where journals play a part. However, the caveat about journals, I tell them, is that in some estimates 60 - 90 percent of the information in journals or aggregated in a database may not be validated. I point out their best source of information, especially tried and true information, is in books, barring an evidence-based report. Of course, not everything follows such a simplified linear progression. I inform them that my expectation is that I should find on their reference list books as well as Internet sources for information that is dynamic.

This is where the light bulb usually goes on for many of them, as I believe they want to serve their patients well, even if it means poring through my reference collection of books. Of course, they always ask, “When are you going to have them in electronic format?”

1http:www.ala.org/acrl/standards/nursing


Get Involved!

Interested in contributing a Featured Article for Doody's Core Titles? Submit an interest form and we'll be in touch with you soon.

We regularly update the Doody's Core Titles® web site when eBook versions, reviews, or information about forthcoming or new editions of titles in DCT 2021. This month we feature:
  • 33 new eBooks
  • 9 new Reviews (Premium Subscribers Only)
  • 1 new Edition

Just Published! Doody's Core Titles® 2021 is available today!

Log in or Order Now to access the full Doody's Core Titles® list.
Doody's Core Titles® 2021
Key Features
A newly selected list of the most distinguished references by subject area
eBook Links to eBook aggregators that carry digital versions
Free monthly Newsletter about new eBooks, new editions, and valuable industry news
Expert recommend-ations of Core Titles and Essential Purchase picks in 121 specialties
Extensive search and filter utilities
Easy-to-use export and print tools
Click here to read what Collection Development Librarians say about Doody's Core Titles®.
Sign up for our Free monthly newsletter alerting you to new eBooks and new editions of DCT titles, as well as valuable industry news and insights. DCT Licensees will have a link to all of the features of Doody's Core Titles® from the newsletter.
Interested in sponsorship opportunities for Doody's Core Titles®? Click here to get more information.