|
|
|
eBook/Digital Version available from:
|
Score: 96 |
 |
Putting a Name to It: Diagnosis in Contemporary Society, 2nd Edition |
 |
ISBN: 978-1-4214-4892-3,
216 pages,
Soft Cover ISBN-10: 1-4214-4892-0 |
 |
Copyright: |
2024 |
 |
Edition: |
2nd |
 |
Author: |
Jutel, Annemarie Goldstein, RN, PhD |
 |
Specialties:
|
General Internal Medicine
, Diagnosis/Assessment |
 |
Publisher: |
Johns Hopkins University Press |
|
2715 North Charles Street |
|
Baltimore, MD 21218 |
|
UNITED STATES |
|
P: 800-537-5487
F: hfscustserv@jh.edu |
|
http://www.press.jhu.edu |
 |
List Price: |
$49.95 |
 |
Google: |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
At A Glance
|
Diagnosis is central to medicine. It creates order, explains illness, identifies treatments, and predicts outcomes. In Putting a Name to It, Annemarie Jutel presents medical diagnosis as more than a mere clinical tool, but as a social phenomenon with the potential to deepen our understanding of health, illness, and disease. Jutel outlines how the sociology of diagnosis should function by situating it within the broader discipline and discussing how the classification of illness and the framing of diagnosis relate to social status and order. This second edition provides important updates to the groundbreaking first edition by incorporating new research that demonstrates how the social nature of diagnosis is just as important as the clinical. It includes new perspectives on diagnostic recognition, coding, lay and crowdsourced diagnosis, algorithmic diagnosis, diagnostic exploitation, systems, stigmatizing diagnosis, and contested diagnosis. The new edition also features a case study of COVID-19 from a critical sociological perspective and a new conclusion. Both a challenge and a call to arms, Putting a Name to It is a lucid, persuasive argument for formalizing, professionalizing, and advancing long-standing practice. Jutel's innovative, open approach and engaging arguments illustrate how diagnoses have the power to legitimize?and stigmatize- our medical ailments. Learn more and order here.
|
Reviewer:
|
Sheriff Dodoo,
MD
(Northeast Georgia Health System)
|
 |
Range
|
Question
|
Score
|
1-10 |
Are the author's objectives met? |
10 |
1-10 |
Rate the worthiness of those objectives. |
10 |
1-5 |
Is this written at an appropriate level? |
5 |
1-5 |
Is there significant duplication? (1=significant, 5=insignificant) |
5 |
1-5 |
Are there significant omissions? (1=significant, 5=insignificant) |
5 |
1-5 |
Rate the authority of the authors. |
5 |
1-5 |
Are there sufficient illustrations? |
5 |
1-5 |
Rate the pedagogic value of the illustrations. |
5 |
1-5 |
Rate the print quality of the illustrations. |
5 |
1-5 |
Are there sufficient references? |
1 |
1-5 |
Rate the currency of the references. |
5 |
1-5 |
Rate the pertinence of the references. |
5 |
1-5 |
Rate the helpfulness of the index. |
5 |
1-5 |
If important in this specialty, rate the physical appearance of the book |
N/A |
1-10 |
Is this a worthwhile contribution to the field? |
10 |
1-10 |
If this is a 2nd or later edition, is this new edition needed? |
10 |
|
 |
Reviewer:
|
Sheriff Dodoo,
MD
(Northeast Georgia Health System)
|
 |
Description
|
The book explores diagnosis as a social construct, reflecting societal views on disease, causes, and risks while shaping patient-doctor relationships. It critiques traditional diagnostic frameworks for failing to address unexplained symptoms and examines the influence of stakeholders like pharmaceutical companies on disease classification, using examples like female hypoactive sexual desire disorder. The updated edition discusses the sociological impact of COVID-19 and proposes future directions for the development and application of diagnoses in healthcare. |
 |
Purpose
|
The author, a leading authority in the sociological context of medical diagnosis, assesses the influences of medical diagnosis from the recognition of disease state and classification of disease state using existing diagnostic frameworks, and provides a sociocultural context for the role of diagnosis on providers and their patients. The book meets its objectives in a persuasive, innovative, and informative approach to exploring the social creation of diagnosis. |
 |
Audience
|
This is a thoughtful and critical appraisal of the sociology of diagnosis and a must-read for medical students, resident physicians, patients, and all professionals in the medical field. Annemarie Jutel, a world-renowned scholar in the sociological context of medical diagnosis, aptly explores the sociocultural influences of diagnosis in this latest edition of the book. |
 |
Features
|
The book explores the concept of diagnosis as a social construct. It examines how naming a diagnosis provides a sociological context for healthcare providers, patients, and families. The book delves into classification systems like the International Statistical Classification of Diseases (ICD) and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) while addressing the social framing of diagnoses, which reflects societal understanding of disease recognition, causes, and risks. Examples such as overweight and fetal death illustrate the emotional and cultural dimensions of diagnosis.Jutel also discusses the critical role of diagnosis in shaping patient-doctor relationships, including the power dynamics and mutual expectations involved. The book highlights instances where traditional diagnostic frameworks fail to address medically unexplained symptoms, particularly in psychiatric disorders. It examines how stakeholdersmanaged care organizations, biotechnology firms, pharmaceutical companies, and consumersaffect the perception and classification of diseases, using female hypoactive sexual desire disorder as a case study.In its updated edition, the book addresses the sociological implications of COVID-19 and its global impact on health. Jutel concludes by suggesting future directions for the sociology of diagnosis, focusing on its development, application, allocation, and broader influences. |
 |
Assessment
|
The book is an interesting read and offers a convincing appraisal of the social construct of diagnosis. A critical recommendation for all who often interphase with a diagnosis. |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|